We MUST Turn the WI Senate Blue!

electionAhead.jpeg

We all know what's at stake here. Can you pitch in?

Many people really HATE to phone others to get the job done. If that describes you, I just have one question: which is worse:

Phoning someone you don't know (and who does not know you) to ask them to vote for a Democratic candidate for the Wisconsin State Senate

OR

Living under Scott Walker's unimpeded reign of error (or should I say TERROR)?

That's where we are, people. Either we elect three additional senators this November, or we continue to enable Scott Walker and his henchmen to ride rough-shod over the state without let or hindrance. It's your choice!

Grassroots North Shore is teaming up with the Senate Democratic Campaign Committee to assist the campaigns of strong candidates who have a real shot at winning. Please join us. Go to our CALENDAR and volunteer for one or more dates. Help Wisconsin rise up again.

Add your reaction Share

We Endorse 9 for the 9th (of August)

9 ON THE 9TH

Grassroots North Shore Endorsements for the August 9th Primary

 

Picture1.png 

John Chisholm -  Milwaukee County District Attorney

ACCOMPLISHMENTS

VISION

Instrumental in establishing:

 

  • Milwaukee’s first drug treatment court
  • Maurice V Pulley Jr Witness Protection Unit
  • Child Protection Advocacy Unit
  • Sojourner Family Peace Center
  • Achieved 95% conviction rate in homicide cases
  • Reduced arrest and incarceration rates for non-violent drug offenses
  • Keep the community safe in a way that respects civil liberties
  • Ending exploitation of women and children due to human trafficking
  • Reform the criminal justice system
  • Continue to implement creative initiatives that address public safety issues and crime in our neighborhoods.
 

Website Facebook Twitter (@DAJohnChisholm)

 

 

Picture2.png 

Russ Feingold – United States Senate

ACCOMPLISHMENTS

VISION

  • Ranked most liberal/progressive by variety of ranking organizations
  • Campaign finance reform
  • Voted no against the Patriot Act
  • Voted no on the Iraqi war
  • Voted for the Affordable Care Act
  • Opposed NAFTA and other free trade agreements
  • Voted in favor of Immigration Reform
  • Cosponsored the Veterans Health Care Budget Reform and Transparency Act

Website

  • Raise the minimum wage
  • Enact paid Family Leave
  • Refinance existing Student Loans
  • Expand Social Security benefits
  • Make prescription drugs affordable
  • Defeat terrorism
  • Expand national Intelligence and Diplomatic efforts
  • Oppose trade agreements that ship WI jobs overseas
  • Supports universal health care with the public option

 

 

 

 

 

 3.png

Gwen Moore – US Congress WI Fourth District

ACCOMPLISHMENTS

VISION

  • First African-American woman elected to the upper chamber of the WI legislature.
  • Democratic co-chair of the Congressional Women's Caucus
  • Staunch supporter of women’s rights, including reproductive rights.
  • Defender of Planned Parenthood
  • Earned 90% and higher legislative agenda approval scores from Planned Parenthood of WI,  NAACP, the Sierra Club of WI, and SEIU

website

Strongly Agrees:

  • Higher taxes on the wealthy
  • Pathway to citizenship
  • Abortion is a woman’s unrestricted right
  • Legally require hiring women and minorities
  • Support same-sex marriage

Strongly disagree

  • Privatize Social Security
  • Support and expand free trade
  • Expand the military
  • Maintain US sovereignty from UN

 

 

 

 4.png

Sarah Lloyd – US Congress, WI Sixth District

 

ACCOMPLISHMENTS

VISION

  • Appointed by Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack as WI Rep to the National Dairy Board
  • Special Projects/Regional Membership Coordinator for WI Farmers Union
  • Representative of the WI Milk Marketing Board
  • Secretary of Board of Directors of the WI Food Hub Cooperative

website

Rejects failed approaches to trade and job creation: 
  • Put workers, farmers and communities first ahead of speculators, global corporations and special interests.
  • Limit currency manipulation
  • Demand an economy that works for people and communities, not just for multinational corporations

 

 

 

 

   
Read more
Add your reaction Share

Make a Date with Us

picnicPotluck.jpgMark your calendars: We're holding our Annual Picnic this year on Sunday, September 18, from 4pm until it's time to get home to watch the Packers!

Grassroots North Shore chefs will be supplying the pulled pork and chicken, the sodas and water, and the plates and cutlery. You bring sides or desserts to share.

It's always a great occasion to renew fellowship with our North Shore progressives, especially in a campaign season. A number of local candidates will be on hand. Don't miss this opportunity to talk to them personally.

Do us a favor, though, and RSVP so we know how much food to make.

rsvp_sm_red3.jpg

Add your reaction Share

Now Is the Time

tears.png

Here we are again.  How unfortunate it is that we can now probably recite gun violence statistics from memory. Some of the all too familiar numbers, thanks to NBC News:

  • Every year in the U.S., an average of more than 100,000 people are shot, according to The Brady Campaign To Prevent Gun Violence.
  • Every day in the U.S., an average of 289 people are shot. Eighty-six of them die: 30 are murdered, 53 kill themselves, two die accidentally, and one is shot in a police intervention, the Brady Campaign reports.
  • Between 2000 and 2010, a total of 335,609 people died from guns -- more than the population of St. Louis, Mo. (318,069), Pittsburgh (307,484), Cincinnati, Ohio (296,223), Newark, N.J. (277,540), and Orlando, Fla. (243,195) (sources:  CDFU.S. Census; CDC)
  • One person is killed by a firearm every 17 minutes, 87 people are killed during an average day, and 609 are killed every week. (source: CDC)

The NRA Arguments Debunked

That bastion of liberty and freedom, the NRA, wraps itself in the American flag and, wielding the Constitution as if it were a sword, fools the public into believing that the organization is really only interested in a person’s rights, but we all know their real agenda is to maximize the profits for gun manufacturers.  Be reminded that the right of the individual to ‘bear arms’ does not go back to the Founding Fathers:  it is the result of the Supreme Court’s decision in District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008).

One of the NRA’s primary tactics is to instill fear, and convince people that the only way they can protect themselves and their families is to possess one or more guns, the more powerful the better.   There is, however, evidence that just the opposite is true.  From Statistics on the Dangers of Gun Use for Self-Defense:

  • A gun is more likely to be used to kill or injure an innocent person in the home than a threatening intruder.
  • Research published in the New England Journal of Medicine found that living in a home where guns are kept increased an individual’s risk of death by homicide by between 40% and 170%.
  • A study published in the American Journal of Epidemiology determined that the presence of guns in the home increased an individual’s risk of death by homicide by 90%.3
  • Research published in the American Journal of Public Health reported that, even after adjusting for confounding factors, individuals who were in possession of a gun were about 4.5 times more likely to be shot in an assault than those not in possession.
  • The gun lobby has often cited the thoroughly debunked statistic that guns are used defensively 2.5 million times per year in the United States.  That discredited estimate came from a 1995 study that suffered from several fatal methodological flaws, including its reliance on only 66 responses in a telephone survey of 5,000 people, multiplied out to purportedly represent over 200 million American adults.6  The authors of that discredited study themselves stated that in up to 64% of their reported defensive gun use cases, the guns were carried or used illegally, including cases where the victim was actually the aggressor.
Read more
Add your reaction Share

(What) A Long, Strange Trip (It’s Been)

Joshua-Glover-mural.jpg
The Rescue of Joshua Glover,
as seen at the Fond du Lac underpass in Milwaukee.
(Artist: Ammar Nsoroma, photo: Jimmywayne on flickr)

Wisconsin, the United States’ thirtieth state was admitted to the Union on May 29, 1848. Under the 1787 Northwest Ordinance, which founded our state, slavery was prohibited. The new state, according to the constitutional convention, would retain the appellate system for higher adjudication. Five circuit judges would meet once per year, effectively acting as the Supreme Court of Wisconsin.  After five years, in 1853, three justices made up the official Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Just as the territory joined the Union, a skilled carpenter named Joshua Glover planned his escape from Bennami Garland’s plantation near St. Louis, Missouri.  Wisconsin, it was known, was a safe haven for those who were fleeing bondage.  Glover knew the risks. He did not know that in 1850, the U.S. Congress passed amendments to the Fugitive Slave Laws of 1793, subsequently called the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850. It required all citizens, not only state and federal officers of the court, to comply with the capture and return of runaway slaves to their "owners."  Proof of ownership was verified by the testimony of one witness.  All alleged fugitive slaves were denied representation. They were not allowed to raise a defense.  Not a word.  The safety of freed or escaped black men and women was in the hands of venal slave traders, bounty hunters and "owners" as well as agents of the government.  Anyone refusing to aid in the capture of an escapee was violating federal law and subject to arrest and imprisonment.  The Fugitive Slave Act did, in fact, embolden and unify the many anti-slavery citizens in Wisconsin, indeed in all the free states. Feeling the strength of their convictions, abolitionists were compelled to disobey the Act, thereby becoming criminals in the eyes of the law.

Traveling north in the spring of 1852, aided by the Underground Railroad, Glover made his way well past the Illinois state line.  Once safely within the borders of Wisconsin, he felt, for the first time in his life, that he might be his own man.  Glover found housing in a cabin and employment at a sawmill, both owned by local Racine businessman, Duncan Sinclair.  Glover lived there peacefully for nearly two years.

Read more
Add your reaction Share

John Nichols Is Coming!

Want to know what a Nichols event is like? Just watch five or ten minutes of this video and then hasten to RSVP for the event:

Nichols is headlining our annual fundraiser with a talk titled "Is Democracy Dead in Wisconsin?" RSVP for this special occasion.

Part of the answer to sustaining a vibrant democracy is sustaining the civic organizations, of which Grassroots North Shore is one. This all-volunteer organization doesn't need tens of thousands of dollars a year to stay in business, but we do need a modest level of support to keep our office running, to provide informative and educational programming four to six times each year, and to participate in electing progressive candidates.

Even if you have to miss seeing John, your donation would be deeply appreciated.

 

Add your reaction Share

Gerrymander on Trial

On May 24, 2016, a three-judge panel in Federal Court will address the question of whether the Wisconsin legislatureʼs 2011 redistricting plan is unconstitutionally partisan. Twelve Wisconsin democrats have sued the Wisconsin Department of Justice alleging that Republican state redistricting was unconstitutionally partisan and “one of the worst gerrymanders ever.”

Gerrymandering is the manipulation of district boundaries for the political advantage of a particular party. The word was coined in 1812 when Massachusetts Governor Eldridge Gerry redrew district lines in Boston to favor his party. The district created had a bizarre shape that resembled a salamander. Gerry and salamander combine to form Gerrymander.

Over the last 200 years gerrymandering has been a tried and true political method. Many strangely shaped districts, not only salamanders, have served the interest of partisan politics. Until recently North Carolina Congressional District 14 was over 80 miles long and in places only as wide as the interstate it followed. The saying was that “If you drove down the Interstate with both car doors open youʼd kill most of the people in the district.”

How district lines are drawn can influence election results in many ways. Common methods are packing and cracking. In “packing” similar voters are packed together in a single district, removing their influence from other districts. In the illustration above, the fourth map shows how packing can work. Notice that most of the blue squares are bundled into two districts, each of which has only one red square in it.

In “cracking” blocks of voters are broken apart and distributed in other districts to dilute their voting strength as much as possible. You can see the effects of cracking most clearly in the third map above. Red squares are broken up into blocks of four, diluting their voting strength in every district.

Political boundaries are usually redrawn every ten years in response to census data. In most states the state legislature controls the redistricting process. Manipulating district boundaries for partisan purposes, or gerrymandering, is not illegal unless the plan violates the Voting Rights Act.

In 2011 Wisconsin Republicans controlled all branches of state government — the assembly, the senate and the governorship. They thus had complete control of the redistricting process, which was carried out in strict secrecy using private lawyers. Only one public hearing was held before the map was passed by the legislature and signed by Governor Walker.

The redistricting map was greeted by a torrent of objections and spawned myriad lawsuits. A large number of documents were lost and a hard drive with redistricting data was destroyed. A judge who had unsuccessfully tried to access documents chastised “the all but shameful attempt to hide the redistricting process from public scrutiny.”

A Latino district that had been split (as a result of cracking) was restored by court order, but otherwise the district lines drawn by the legislature in 2011 formed the basis of the electoral districts for the 2012 and 2014 elections. The map was attacked by Democrats as an example of extreme gerrymandering. Although the districts it created lacked bizarre shapes, the districts were drawn so as to strengthen the Republican hold on government. For instance, the liberal suburb of Shorewood was removed from the state senate district of conservative Alberta Darling — in a clear example of cracking — to strengthen her against a possible recall election. Kenosha and Racine, both Democratic, were packed together, enabling a strong Republican district to be formed to the west.

 

Read more
Add your reaction Share