The Collision between the War on Poverty and Recent Tax Policy Choices

wisconsinBudgetProject_sm.gifIn the third webinar in our Information for Activation Series, Jon Peacock, Project Director of the Wisconsin Budget Project, presented "The Collision between the War on Poverty and Recent Tax Policy Choices." You can view his powerpoint presentation below:

You can also listen to and watch the recorded presentation. You may want to fast forward through the first 1.5 minutes because there was some lag while Jon waited for participants to complete the log in process.

Add your reaction Share

Information For Activation: Citizens' Voices Matter for Environmental Protection

In the second of our series of webinars, Kim Wright, Executive Director of Midwest Environmental Advocates, Inc., presented "Citizen Voices Matter for Environmental Protection." Here is her powerpoint presentation:

You can also see a part of the presentation with Kim's commentary. We managed to capture the presentation and the question and answer period that followed starting on about slide 16, or about 2/3 of the entire program. (You will need the Flash player to view it.)

https://www.anymeeting.com/278-380-295/EF50D8888947

1 reaction Share

Know Your Obamacare!

In the first of our series of webinars, Grassroots North Shore co-sponsored a presentation on the positive changes the Affordable Care Act (aka Obamacare) has begun to deliver to the American people. Below, you will find Kevin Kane's powerpoint slides from that presentation. Reviewing the talk will provide you with the information you'll need to be an effective advocate for the new healthcare law and to be an effective activist for progressive policies and candidates.

More webinars on subjects vital to progressives everywhere are scheduled for Thursday evenings, from 7-7:30, on January 16, 23, and 30 plus February 13 and 20. Watch this space for links to sign up for the upcoming programs. Each presentation will last about 15 minutes with another 15 minutes for audience questions and answers.

Tune in!

Add your reaction Share

Information for Activation

Thoughts lead to action, but effective action needs well-informed activists.

That's the purpose behind the Grassroots North Shore Information for Activation series of webinars. Through these weekly sessions, you will learn to be a more effective advocate for good, solid, progressive policies that will benefit all of us.

And now’s the time to get going in earnest: in case you hadn't noticed, 2014 is an election year and the future of Wisconsin is at stake. Because "knowledge is power," you can empower yourself and others by participating in these 30-minute webinars. The information you will hear will help you persuade others to support progressive policies and to vote for progressive candidates in the fall.

Please join us for our next two presentations and mark your calendar for our future ones!

 

Read more
Add your reaction Share

Follow The Money -- In Reverse

Thanks to Chris Larson's request to the Legislative Fiscal Bureau  we can now see how much money the Walker administration returned to the Federal Government --- $904,484,196.  This does not even include the money rejected for Medicaid expansion or $75,000,000 paid to the Wisconsin Hospital Association to cover more nonpaying low-income patients who will end up going to emergency rooms when they become ill.

In addition to funds to implement the Affordable Care Act, Obamacare, Wisconsin turned back $637,114 in a Consumer Assistance Grant to provide information and answer questions regarding health care and health insurance, $795,000,000 that would have brought High-Speed Rail to the State, and $22,978,367 to improve internet access to unserved and underserved areas including schools and libraries.

Jobs?  The Bureau estimates that Wisconsin lost 276 jobs in IT alone.  Add the thousands of jobs that building High-Speed rail would have created and Walker would have come a lot closer to the 250,000 jobs he promised to bring to the state.

Read the full report. . . 

Read more
Add your reaction Share

Yet Another Look at Wisconsin's Job Performance

Professor Menzie Chinn at Econbrowser summarized the Walker jobs record in one nifty graph:

actual and projected job growth

Figure 1: Private nonfarm payroll employment for Wisconsin, seasonally adjusted (blue), July 2013 Wisconsin Economic Outlook forecast, interpolated from annual data using quadratic match (red), and Walker's promised path for private NFP (black). September and October private NFP from WI DWD. NBER defined recession dates shaded gray. Source: BLS and DWD, Wisconsin Economic Outlook, and author's calculations.

 

1 reaction Share

Lots of Nothing to Cheer About

risingUnemployment.jpgAlthough Wisconsin's unemployment rate has fallen (to 6.5%), part of the decline seems to be the result of a shrinking labor pool. And the number of new unemployment claims, as reported by the US Department of Labor for the week of December 7, 2013, was the highest in the nation!

The Cap Times reported an official explanation: "Officials with the state Department of Workforce Development explain that Wisconsin historically sees a seasonal increase in unemployment claims around Thanksgiving -- in part because of deer hunting...." But of course other states also have deer hunting seasons, rendering the "explanation" curious at best. Perhaps even downright ridiculous.

But the increase in new unemployment claims was not the only unhappy outcome of Governor Walker's policies. His decision to refuse to expand Medicaid under the terms of the Affordable Care Act is going to cost Wisconsin taxpayers a bundle. The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel finds that Iowa's path is quite similar in many ways to the path Wisconsin is taking, except that Iowa's strategy is going to cost its citizens "a fraction" of what Wisconsin's strategy will be costing us.

Here are the key paragraphs in the Journal Sentinel story:

The broad structure of Iowa's plan — such as relying more on private health plans and less on the traditional Medicaid program — is similar to the approach developed by Walker and approved by the Legislature to increase the number of people with health insurance.

But in Iowa, the federal government is paying the full cost for the first three years of expanding its Medicaid program to cover all adults. The federal share will eventually decline to 90% of the cost.

In contrast, Wisconsin is paying 40%, and the federal government paying the other 60%.

The difference could work out to several hundred million dollars in additional spending for Wisconsin taxpayers over the next decade.

And the explanation for the decision to forgo hundreds of millions of dollars in federal funds?
The Walker administration and Republican state legislators contend that the federal dollars allocated through the Affordable Care Act will be reduced in future years, potentially saddling states with a larger share of the cost of expanding their Medicaid programs.
So Wisconsin citizens are paying federal income taxes and medicare taxes, but these revenues are all flowing to other states because the Republicans in our state are afraid that at some point in the future, federal support for the program might be reduced.
Meanwhile, the "solution" Wisconsin adopted means that "Walker's plan still relies on the federal government paying 60% of the cost of expanding the Medicaid program, and whether that money will be available long-term is not guaranteed, either."
It's hard to understand why anyone would think four more years of this sort of logic would be a good thing.
1 reaction Share